Comparative Insight: Plate Compactor PME‑C50 vs. Vibratory Plate Compactor PME‑C90
Table of Contents Introduction In the competitive realm of construction equipment, selecting the right compaction machine can significantly affect project outcomes. This article delves into a detailed comparison between the nimble PME‑C50 and the high-performance Vibratory Plate Compactor PME‑C90. By exploring their technical differences, operational strengths, and ideal applications, we aim to guide contractors and DIY professionals in making an informed decision. Technical Specification Plate Compactor PME-C50 Model Plate Compactor PME-C50 Engine Loncin LC152F Engine type Air-cooled, single cylinder, 4-stroke, petrol engine / diesel engine Frequency [VPM] 5200 Centrifugal force [KN] 9 Plate size (LxW) [cm] 43×31 Max.compaction depth[cm] 20 Travel speed [m/min] 20 Max.inclination angle 20 N.W./G.W. [kg] 54/58 Package (LxWxH) [cm] 69x38x53 Vibratory Plate Compactor PME-C90 Model Vibratory Plate Compactor PME-C90 Engine Honda / Robin / Loncin / Diesel engine Engine type Air-cooled, single cylinder, 4-stroke, petrol engine / diesel engine Frequency [VPM] 4200 Centrifugal force [KN] 16 Plate size (LxW) [cm] 55×45 Max.compaction depth[cm] 35 Travel speed [m/min] 25 Max.inclination angle 20° N.W./G.W. [kg] 89/95 Package (LxWxH) [cm] 66x48x67 Technical Specifications and Design PME‑C50 Overview: Compact and